The Lebanese NGO Legal Agenda has claimed that the majority of rights violations in Lebanon toward LGBTQI+ people are perpetrated by the state, rather than by citizens. They see it as part of the state’s broader tendency to mistreat members of all marginalised communities. 

Lebanon’s main police force, the Internal Security Forces (ISF), is in charge of enforcing “morality-related” laws, some of which target LGBTI people. The precarious legal status of LGBTI people in Lebanon, combined with social stigma around them, makes them particularly vulnerable to police abuses. Verbal abuse, physical violence, and other forms of torture toward LGBTI people have been reported at various police stations around Beirut. Although a complaints mechanism does exist, LGBT people often avoid reporting torture or degrading treatment due to fear that their sexual orientation or gender identity will exposed.

Until 2012, it was common state practice to use forced anal exams on arrested for homosexual conduct. However, in 2012 Lebanese activists labeled the exams “Tests of Shame” and successfully mounted a public campaign against the practice. As a result of the campaign, the Lebanese Order of Physicians and the Ministry of Justice “issue[d] guidelines prohibiting the use of forced anal exams.” However, Human Rights Watch has found that some judges in Lebanon are still asking for forced anal exams of homosexual men and some doctors are still performing them. Police are now using techniques other than anal tests to “prove” one’s homosexuality. For example, they will check the person’s cell phone apps, contacts, and pictures on social media to determine if he/she is LGBT. However, most judges no longer use jail time as punishment for homosexuality, decreasing the risk of inhumane treatment in prison. Instead, those who are arrested must usually pay a fine.

Politicians still negatively target the LGBTI community in their rhetoric. For example, in 2013 the mayor of the Beirut suburb of Dekwaneh ordered security forces to raid and shut down a gay-friendly nightclub. The minister of interior at the time backed the mayor’s actions, saying, “Lebanon is opposed to homosexuality, and according to Lebanese law it is a criminal offence.” The next year, the Internal Security Forces Morals Protection Bureau conducted a raid on a Turkish hammam in Beirut due to the “suspected presence of homosexual individuals.” Though no evidence of sexual activity was found at the hammam, the arrestees were forced to confess to homosexual acts and prostitution. In order to obtain these confessions, torture was used. 

Nonetheless, progress in the country has been made. For example, in 2013, the Lebanese Psychiatric Society publicly declared that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. In 2015, they updated their statement to call for the abolition of Article 534. In 2016, Lebanon recognised the existence of a transgender man for the first time, and allowed him to change his gender on public records. Additionally, organisations such as Helem and Proud Lebanon, which work on LGBTI rights, have been allowed to register and participate in Lebanese civil society.

In May 2017, Lebanon hosted its first week of Pride events. However, these cannot be considered a sign of general acceptance of the LGBT community in the country, as the events were met with a significant amount of social backlash. Sunni extremists sympathetic to al-Qaeda prevented some of the activities from occurring, while simultaneously a church in Tripoli held a conference about how to “convert homosexuals to normative sexual behavior.” The Hezbollah Secretary General Hasan Nasrallah, declared that homosexuality was an import from the West and that “homosexual relations defy logic, human nature, and the human mind.” 

Lebanon has long been a more culturally diverse and, in some ways, more tolerant place than other countries in the Middle East with regard to homosexuality. However, people who are LGBTI or suspected of being LGBTI are often harassed and blackmailed. For example, LGBT individuals are mocked on TV, gender-non-conforming people are at risk of being arrested on suspicion of homosexual acts, and police still regularly raid nightclubs frequented by gay men. Additionally, LGBTI people living outside of Beirut may face significantly different challenges than those in the city. 

According to a Pew poll from 2013, 18% of people in Lebanon believe that homosexuality should be accepted by society. Though still a minority, the percentage is still much larger than in surrounding countries. 

Since 2007, there have been multiple court cases in Lebanon that were promising for the recognition of LGBTI human rights. Unfortunately, we have been unable to find the primary documentation of these cases, but links to NGO reports and news articles discussing the cases are provided below.

2007: Judge Mounir Suleiman stops a criminal investigation of two men arrested for same-sex conduct, disputing that homosexuality was “contrary to the order of nature” and arguing that sexual conduct perceived to be “unnatural” is often a reflection of social mores. 

2009: A judge acquits a defendant charged under Article 534 of the Penal Code by arguing that the concept of nature is a socio=cultural construct, and therefore it is impossible to determine that any behaviour is categorically unnatural.

2014: A court dismisses a case against a transgender woman and cisgender man, stating that homosexuality was not “unnatural.”

2017: Judge Rabih Maalouf argues that “homosexuality is a personal choice, not a criminal offence.” He refers to Article 183 of the Penal Code which states, “an act undertaken in the exercise of a right without abuse shall not be regarded as an offense.” 

Nasser Mustapha Karouni v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 7 March 2005) found that Hezbollah and Lebanese local governments were credible threats to gay men like the appellant, and that the risk of the appellant was increased by his infection with AIDS. As a result, it is determined that he meets the “ten percent [chance] of future persecution” for establishing a well-founded fear, as determined by Al-Harbi v. INS. The appellant’s petition for review is granted and the immigration judge’s finding that the appellant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution is reversed.

Decision 071818233 [2008] RRTA 62 (Australian Refugee Review Tribunal, 15 February 2008) ruled that a gay man had a “well-founded fear of persecution” in Lebanon because of his membership in a particular social group (i.e. the particular social group of homosexuals), and was therefore a person to whom Australia had a protection obligation under the Refugee Convention.

Decision 1304329 [2013] RRTA 816 (Australian Refugee Review Tribunal, 25 November 2013) ruled that, although a gay man from Lebanon might be a member of a particular social group, he did not prove that he had a well-founded fear of persecution if he returned to Lebanon, so he was not found to be a person who Australia was obligated to protect under the Refugee Convention.